Legal review (25/01/2022)
Notes from the publication flow review with legal
Things we learned from the meeting:
How might we avoid errors in not publishing mandatory public decisions?
We know the decision types that need to be published mandatory.
How might we help users reach their deadlines?
agenda > 10 days before meeting, additional agenda > 5 days before meeting, decision list > 10 days after meeting, notulen > 10 day after the notulen are approved
How might we avoid the publishing of notulen that are not yet approved?
Notulen can only be published if they are approved in a meeting
How might we fit the publication flow closer to the offline flow?
“Uittreksels” is not the correct term
“Spoedeisende agenda” is a separate step from the normal agenda and additional agenda.
Revocation is not an issue or very rare.
Last updated