Legal review (25/01/2022)

Notes from the publication flow review with legal

Things we learned from the meeting:

  • How might we avoid errors in not publishing mandatory public decisions?

    • We know the decision types that need to be published mandatory.

  • How might we help users reach their deadlines?

    • agenda > 10 days before meeting, additional agenda > 5 days before meeting, decision list > 10 days after meeting, notulen > 10 day after the notulen are approved

  • How might we avoid the publishing of notulen that are not yet approved?

    • Notulen can only be published if they are approved in a meeting

  • How might we fit the publication flow closer to the offline flow?

    • “Uittreksels” is not the correct term

    • “Spoedeisende agenda” is a separate step from the normal agenda and additional agenda.

  • Revocation is not an issue or very rare.

Last updated